You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I understand well, the idea is to remove 78-level constants from the lexer, and replace all the places where they can replace a LITERAL by a rule that also accepts a WORD and checks if it is a 78-level ?
Not completely, the lexer would return a new token (which gets a new tree if CB_CONST is not good enough), so the parser knows that this is a constant.
Note: This should be handled identical for both the extension level 78 constant and the standard 01 CONSTANT AS.
To get better error messages.
If I understand well, the idea is to remove 78-level constants from the lexer, and replace all the places where they can replace a LITERAL by a rule that also accepts a WORD and checks if it is a 78-level ?
Originally posted by @lefessan in #133 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: