You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So, no, I don't think we should enforce unique @ORDER.
@kba, but IMO we have to respect DFG's application profile for METS here, too. Version 2.3.1 says regarding physical structMap in section 2.2.2.1 (on p.14):
The ORDER attribute has to contain a numerical sorting value,
which is used to bring the individual pages into their correct
physical sequence.
The ORDERLABEL attribute can contain the pagination of the
individual page according to the original.
The LABEL attribute can include the foliation of the individual
page or the specification of record side and track number.
@kba, but IMO we have to respect DFG's application profile for METS here, too. Version 2.3.1 says regarding physical structMap in section 2.2.2.1 (on p.14):
So regarding the options you presented in #1133,
I would have preferred option 2 for setting.
See #821 for getting that info on the CLI.
Originally posted by @bertsky in #1134 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: