You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
The yield of isprene to SOA should be reduced from 5 % to 0.5 % Impact all chemistry set-up (chem_mech.doc) Should likely be default in NorESM2.3. Sara Blichner should be asked if she still think the 0.5 % is what she recommends. Added her github in the discussion section below
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
we have now reduced the SOA-yield for isoprene from 0.05 to 0.005 in NorESM2.3. We see however that the anthropogenic aerosol ERF becomes considerably stronger: -1.62 W/m2 (+/-0.08 W/m2). In earlier versions (NorESM2), the anthropogenic aerosol ERF was around -1.2 to -1.4 W/m2.
Have you tested the anthropogenic aerosol ERF with these lower SOA-yields? Did you get similar results?
Might the impact of these SOA-yield changes also be different in a simulation containing your NPF code and a simulation without the NPF code (NorESM2.3 currently doesn't contain the NPF code)?
What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
The yield of isprene to SOA should be reduced from 5 % to 0.5 % Impact all chemistry set-up (chem_mech.doc) Should likely be default in NorESM2.3. Sara Blichner should be asked if she still think the 0.5 % is what she recommends. Added her github in the discussion section below
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
@sarambl
Will this change (regression test) answers?
Yes
Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?
Yes, but I will need some help
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: