Fix formatting issues in docs #662
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
|
|
jmoralez
reviewed
Oct 13, 2023
hahnbeelee
commented
Oct 13, 2023
jmoralez
reviewed
Oct 16, 2023
|
I've triggered the CI, once that passes I'll merge it. Thanks! |
jmoralez
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
There were some issues in the notebooks that were causing parsing errors. This PR removes all of them. This PR does not include all the automations needed to migrate to Mintlify, but is rather an incremental PR.
Test Plan
Since this is still on the old docs, run
nbdev_docsand ensure everything looks good.