-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate restrict-eval
#8295
Comments
(also nix >=2.16 breaks the |
@Artturin Yeah we would do something else for Hydra/Ofborg/Etc. I suspect it perhaps could just be pure eval, with a few things to make that more versatile. |
From my understanding, #9061 made it so that even the most common Nix flakes (e.g. using a I feel like it's important for something to be done before a release of current master. |
How does this issue and the current thinking relate to #1701? Should we do one instead of the other? |
Arguably we can't just remove it, as current thinking seems to have converged on keeping stable interfaces stable. @NixOS/nix-team correct me if I'm wrong. Until we have a deprecation policy as linked in the linked comment, we won't remove things that are a result of past design decisions. (Bugs in the implementation of design decisions are something else.) In that case it would make sense to close the issue suggesting to remove |
As discussed in the Nix team meeting today: #7871 (comment)
Proposal
Issue a warning when the setting is enabled and direct users to GitHub if they would be impacted by the feature being removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: