You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The TGP does not seem to account for the update rate now modelled with the F-16 radar. For example, a contact soft locked in TWS would show the same in the TGP as if it were locked in STT. The expected behaviour of this would be similar to the HUD marker, where the "position" jumps every refresh and is not constantly tracking the object.
The TGP itself is slaved to the radar so this should not be a case of the TGP itself locking and tracking. I do not think it is possible with F-16 irl to lock an airborne target.
Here is an example video, you can see the refresh rate is approximately once every second, but the TGP continuously tracks it.
The TGP does not seem to account for the update rate now modelled with the F-16 radar. For example, a contact soft locked in TWS would show the same in the TGP as if it were locked in STT. The expected behaviour of this would be similar to the HUD marker, where the "position" jumps every refresh and is not constantly tracking the object.
The TGP itself is slaved to the radar so this should not be a case of the TGP itself locking and tracking. I do not think it is possible with F-16 irl to lock an airborne target.
Here is an example video, you can see the refresh rate is approximately once every second, but the TGP continuously tracks it.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IucBsFeSHKjT9Ij28hfPTS5p4qdJO-XN/view?usp=sharing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: