OOP2: why a closed source component ? #3798
Unanswered
marinthiercelin
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
It allows rapid response to sensor changes without of xDrip code. It may contain elements of code that could be targetted by the OEM for IP violations. Two possible reasons for keeping it outside. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
Is there any specific reason why the decoding of data from Freestyle Libre 2 sensors is handled by OOP2, an external process that is not open source ?
Is it an issue of licensing ?
Would I get into legal trouble if I would reverse engineer the OOP2 service to make a similar service ?
Thanks for any advice
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions