Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add semantic versioning support #351

Open
MuratUrsavas opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Add semantic versioning support #351

MuratUrsavas opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MuratUrsavas
Copy link
Contributor

It would be better to switch to semantic versioning, where application version is controlled automatically via GitHub.

One point is missing on my side, though. The documentation clearly explains how to bump the major and minor version numbers, but it's not clear how to bump maintenance and prerelease numbers.

@MuratUrsavas MuratUrsavas self-assigned this Jan 24, 2022
@vpetersson
Copy link
Contributor

This is a fair bit complicated than it seems. We discussed this in today's stand-up and decided that we need to scope this further in grooming but here are the cliffnotes:

  • We should adopt full semantic versioning for the Nebra software suite
  • This should follow standard semantic versioning (major, minor, patch)
  • This should be fully detached from the Helium Miner GA versions
    • The GA version will be part of the release and it's TBD how this will affect the version bump
  • We need to have clear guidelines on what constitutes a major/minor/patch release
  • Each release must have clear release notes

Semi-relevant ticket:

@shawaj
Copy link
Member

shawaj commented Mar 1, 2022

@vpetersson @marvinmarnold are we still thinking to include semantic versioning at some point? or is the nebra software version hash thing sufficient for now?

@vpetersson
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah i still want to add proper semantic versioning for this as it will be a lot easier to generate change logs for.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants