Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non-pythonic workers? #48

Open
turicas opened this issue Mar 3, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Non-pythonic workers? #48

turicas opened this issue Mar 3, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@turicas
Copy link
Contributor

turicas commented Mar 3, 2013

What if we have some code in C, Perl, Ruby or another language and want to have it as a worker inside a pipeline? Currently we can't run do this unless we create a Python worker that executes a process, calling the external code.
A possible implementation to solve this problem is to create a "worker socket" (or other kind of inter-process communication, maybe using ZeroMQ) on Broker so any process that connects there (and authenticates?) can register itself as a worker, independent of how (which language) it's implemented.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant