Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Select Sprite to use from file #27

Closed
VampireSeraphin opened this issue Sep 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

[Request] Select Sprite to use from file #27

VampireSeraphin opened this issue Sep 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
(RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations

Comments

@VampireSeraphin
Copy link

Can we get an addition to MML lab where you can open a dialog window and select the sprite for your unit from the existing units, and it adds it to the mechset.txt local?

It would be much easier to have a small gui for this than continuously adding things to the localmechset manually.

@HammerGS HammerGS added the (RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations label Sep 8, 2016
@Dylan-M Dylan-M added this to the Post-Stable milestone Oct 5, 2016
@Dylan-M
Copy link
Contributor

Dylan-M commented Oct 5, 2016

Since MML is a standalone product and run from a separate folder from MegaMek, a better solution would be to just create the line entry somewhere in the UI for easy copy/paste into the MechSet. Otherwise we would also have to allow choosing of the MechSet file to edit.

@VampireSeraphin
Copy link
Author

Could you add a pop-up when you choose to load a unit from the cache to "use this sprite?" which edits your local mechset?

@Dylan-M Dylan-M modified the milestones: Stable 0.44, Development 0.45 Feb 11, 2018
@neoancient neoancient removed this from the Development 0.45 milestone Oct 4, 2020
@HammerGS
Copy link
Member

Completed with #1450

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
(RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants