We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In order to adhere to a federated system, we need to adhere to the following principles when dealing with non-breaking changes:
What happened here, is that it was a field addition, but the logic that would process a claim without the field addition was removed.
For forwards compatibility, this would still allow an old node would be able to discover a new node.
But for backwards compatibility, this prevented the ability, the removed logic would no longer be able to discover an old node.
#737
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ENG-341 Backwards Compatibility of Discovery Mechanism
Sorry, something went wrong.
Discovery.processClaimLinkIdentity
{ c241cd7219eafd37258af82de0b18cb3: { payload: { iat: 1718152555, iss: 'vcj3ufun2506jn44q7rr9bc1hv4c6eebicusfj1bl9sr27ookknlg', jti: 'v0pj8tllneho0169hv7vbh2g39o', nbf: 1718152555, prevClaimId: 'v0phklr879to0169hv7vbh2g39o', prevDigest: 'z2DrjgbJrZvLH1h319LrUMkgeQY4DXrAGMXwZoRZaezC4mq4nNP', seq: 2, sub: '["github.com","CMCDragonkai"]', typ: 'ClaimLinkIdentity' }, signatures: [ [Object] ] }, '25cc937e27085b05360926af70925192': { payload: { iat: 1714728656, iss: 'vcj3ufun2506jn44q7rr9bc1hv4c6eebicusfj1bl9sr27ookknlg', jti: 'v0phklr879to0169hv7vbh2g39o', nbf: 1714728656, prevClaimId: null, prevDigest: null, seq: 1, sub: '["github.com","CMCDragonkai"]', typ: 'ClaimLinkIdentity' }, signatures: [ [Object] ] } }
console.log from Discovery domain shows that both claims are processed ^
console.log
Discovery
amydevs
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Specification
In order to adhere to a federated system, we need to adhere to the following principles when dealing with non-breaking changes:
What happened here, is that it was a field addition, but the logic that would process a claim without the field addition was removed.
For forwards compatibility, this would still allow an old node would be able to discover a new node.
But for backwards compatibility, this prevented the ability, the removed logic would no longer be able to discover an old node.
Additional context
#737
Tasks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: