You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We employ some data and techniques provided by NIST for existing tests. However, the problem is still there:
GSL uses some magic numbers to check how accurate the functions are, still, there is no justification for that. In addition, higher accuracy is possible (say 1e-16 instead of 1e-15);
There is no simple implementation of a generator of ill-conditioned sum.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
We employ some data and techniques provided by NIST for existing tests. However, the problem is still there:
1e-16
instead of1e-15
);Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions