Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use bdk python bindings in place of bitcoind for integration tests #11

Open
BitcoinZavior opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@BitcoinZavior
Copy link
Contributor

BitcoinZavior commented Nov 22, 2023

Need arm64 architecture support for bdk-python before bdk can be used for integration tests

@BitcoinZavior BitcoinZavior changed the title Use bdk python bindings in place of bitcoind for integration test case Use bdk python bindings in place of bitcoind for integration tests Nov 22, 2023
@DanGould
Copy link
Contributor

DanGould commented Dec 3, 2024

Is there a reason we need the complexity of BDK in the bindings project for tests? could we not include a BDK test at the rust-payjoin library level to ensure compatibility and use simple bitcoind tests to test each binding layer?

@BitcoinZavior
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there a reason we need the complexity of BDK in the bindings project for tests? could we not include a BDK test at the rust-payjoin library level to ensure compatibility and use simple bitcoind tests to test each binding layer?

Yes thats one option. The reason to use bdk for integration tests was to ensure ffi wrapper works just as well as rust payjoin. Secondly to identify any integration issues when using bdk and thirdly as a guide for bdk users to integrate payjoin.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants