You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, @lilqilie@LorMeBioAI I have successfully installed DCiPatho and modified self.best_model_name and self.raw_fasta_path according to the readme. However, when I tried to modify the output file, I found that the predicted results were very poor. If it is set as default temp_data, the result will be 0.65 for y. But after I changed it to result, the result dropped directly to 0.0007, which is very confusing? In addition, the results are different when I run them on different machines. This is strange and I don't know where the problem occurred.
this is the modified config file:
# set combined_fasta_path if needed or just by default
self.combined_fasta_path = 'results/temp_combined_fna.fasta'
# settings for calculation of kmer frequency of fasta
self.ks = [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
self.num_procs = 8
self.freqs_file = 'results/freqs_file.npy'
self.save_res_path = 'results/results_for_pre.csv'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, @lilqilie @LorMeBioAI I have successfully installed DCiPatho and modified self.best_model_name and self.raw_fasta_path according to the readme. However, when I tried to modify the output file, I found that the predicted results were very poor. If it is set as default temp_data, the result will be 0.65 for y. But after I changed it to result, the result dropped directly to 0.0007, which is very confusing? In addition, the results are different when I run them on different machines. This is strange and I don't know where the problem occurred.
this is the modified config file:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: