Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using MNN corrected data for per cell pathway scoring #38

Open
jiajinlongkang opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Using MNN corrected data for per cell pathway scoring #38

jiajinlongkang opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@jiajinlongkang
Copy link

Hi MNN group,

I see in the MNN help pages that it is not recommended to use MNN-corrected gene expression matrix for quantitative analysis such as differential gene expression. But I wonder if it is reasonable to use it to calculate pathway scores in each cell (i.e. in each cell, transform the gene expression into pathway scores based on certain pre-defined gene-pathway mappings). This process does not involve any between-cell comparisons. Does this sound reasonable to you?

Thanks you,
Jack

@LTLA
Copy link
Owner

LTLA commented Jun 18, 2022

I would say that the suggestion in the ?fastMNN would still apply to pathway scores; you are still deriving a statistic based on the per-gene corrected profiles, which may not have an obvious interpretation as described here.

Now, it depends on what you want to do with the pathway scores. If all you want is to visualize it on a plot, I'd say go ahead; the corrected values are useful here (and is in fact why they are reported in the first place) to allow people to avoid big jumps in color between batches. However, if you're planning to do actual statistical analyses on them, I would suggest computing the scores from the uncorrected data and applying a blocking factor in your model or test to deal with the batch effect.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants