-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Equation for Rayleigh number in LH2Simulate.m #2
Comments
Indeed 👍 |
Hello @db-code-rabbit and @SSavelyeva I need your help. [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p0zxnYC0EA0d2Dq9DoG9NP_nrhJ-gQ7-/view?usp=sharing] (THE LITRETAURE) Thanks for your time! |
Hello @matrix7956. Regarding the heat transfer to the liquid phase. Start correcting the expression of the Rayleigh number in the code. there are some errors in the code as already noticed above. Take the time to look at the physics and correlations used by the author. As you have already been advised, use this code as a basis (to improve or modify it) for your physical problem to study. |
Hello @db-code-rabbit |
Hello @matrix7956, Have you fixed your heat transfer problem in the liquid phase at the trailer, found by comparing the results of the published code and the authors's paper. First of all, Sorry for my reply time. So I have had time to look at the Code and as I previously said, there are some errors in the correlations used to calculate the heat transfer in the different tanks. At least I think so! To be confirmed or denied by the authors of the published code. But, by fixing these errors, I didn't get exactly the presented results in the paper of authors. We get the same trend of heat transfer in the liquid phase, but unfortunately, not the same magnitude values. Below, the image results after modifications. |
Hello @matrix7956, Have you fixed your heat transfer problem in the liquid phase at the trailer, found by comparing the results of the published code and the authors's paper. First of all, Sorry for my reply time. So I have had time to look at the Code and as I previously said, there are some errors in the correlations used to calculate the heat transfer in the different tanks. At least I think so! To be confirmed or denied by the authors of the published code. But, by fixing these errors, I didn't get exactly the presented results in the paper of authors. We get the same trend of heat transfer in the liquid phase, but unfortunately, not the same magnitude values. Below, the image results after modifications. |
Hello @db-code-rabbit |
Hi @matrix7956, |
Hello, |
@db-code-rabbit Hello |
@matrix7956 Hello, |
@db-code-rabbit Thankyou. means a lot .yes I will test it and get back. |
@matrix7956 Have you tested it , finally? |
Hello @db-code-rabbit |
I, too, was unable to match the heat transfer in the vapor phase and the liquid phase using the old version of the code. Now, I will try the new version as suggested by @db-code-rabbit. I will update about the outcome. Thanks for sharing the code. |
@db-code-rabbit results of heat transfer in the vapor phase and the liquid phase are entirely different from the published paper with the new version of the code. Not matching well. |
On the Y-axis values are significantly large. |
Dear researchers, thank you very much for publishing the simulation code!
I have a question conserning the formula for the Rayleigh number in LH2Simulate.m file (for example, in line 409):
Maybe I have missunderstood something, but could it be possible that in this equation the kinematic viscosity should be squared? I found the following equation for the Rayleigh number:
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thank you very much in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: