Thanks @EBerzin !

Thanks @EBerzin !

Actually one more thing: can you please edit the PR description too to reflect you also changed the 4 GeV settings (with a link to the talk from Megan)

I'd like to trigger the full test, for that I'll move this to "draft" and back to "ready"

OK the only plot failing is this. I think it's expected since that's the only PU workflow we have, and the change on the plot is exactly what we change. It's actually even a bit surprising that it didnt have more visible effects downstream.

there are a few places where the trigger decision differs but I guess either a) there are no trigger pass/fail plots in the DQM b) the KS test still judges the distributions to be "from the same underlying distribution"

examples from the log diff:

  < [ trigger ] 68 debug: Got trigger energy cut 10000 for 2 electrons counted in the event.
  < [ trigger ] 68 debug: Got trigger energy sum 10147.9; and decision is pass = false
  ---
  > [ trigger ] 68 debug: Got trigger energy cut 10790 for 2 electrons counted in the event.
  > [ trigger ] 68 debug: Got trigger energy sum 10147.9; and decision is pass = true
[...]
  < [ trigger ] 334 debug: Got trigger energy cut 10000 for 2 electrons counted in the event.
  < [ trigger ] 334 debug: Got trigger energy sum 10210.8; and decision is pass = false
  ---
  > [ trigger ] 334 debug: Got trigger energy cut 10790 for 2 electrons counted in the event.
  > [ trigger ] 334 debug: Got trigger energy sum 10210.8; and decision is pass = true