You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently COBREXA only supports M (metabolic) models. Increasingly people are building ME (metabolic and expression) models. These are much more complicated since they include ribosomes etc., and are no longer LPs, but are much more expressive and capture substantially more physiology than basic M models. We should make a model type that can handle them. Also, StandardModel should be extended to be able to cope with whatever extra info is required to build them (#655 is step 1 in this direction). See here for the only other attempt at this:
#717 is a start along with this process. However, full RBA might have to wait until later since I doubt it will be done within the next 2 months (the window for 2.0)
Currently COBREXA only supports M (metabolic) models. Increasingly people are building ME (metabolic and expression) models. These are much more complicated since they include ribosomes etc., and are no longer LPs, but are much more expressive and capture substantially more physiology than basic M models. We should make a model type that can handle them. Also,
StandardModel
should be extended to be able to cope with whatever extra info is required to build them (#655 is step 1 in this direction). See here for the only other attempt at this:https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006302
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: