You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current method of figuring out what the contents of the document are is to sync back to the start of the document. This means that the time to sync gradually increases and increases until the program becomes unusable. The only solution that I can think of this is to create "squash" messages that copy old messages into a single "squashed" message containing the text in a certain region.
However, this creates a large problem. Let's say that early in the edit history somebody adds a paragraph or so that nobody changes later. Most likely, a smart algorithm would "squash" this paragraph relatively early on. This would require each client to still sync back that far to fetch any additions that could've been made to that squash since it was created. The solution, in my view, is to group messages associated with a certain squash together in a message thread. This is a WIP proposal for Matrix under issue https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1198. The requirements for threads to be used for squashing:
Be able to send full Matrix messages to each
Be able to sync/filter threads separately from the main room
Be able to create threads inside threads infinitely
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As I hinted in Matrix Live, I'm leaning towards having an optional server API that can figure out the "head" events, i.e, the ones that have not been overwritten.
The current method of figuring out what the contents of the document are is to sync back to the start of the document. This means that the time to sync gradually increases and increases until the program becomes unusable. The only solution that I can think of this is to create "squash" messages that copy old messages into a single "squashed" message containing the text in a certain region.
However, this creates a large problem. Let's say that early in the edit history somebody adds a paragraph or so that nobody changes later. Most likely, a smart algorithm would "squash" this paragraph relatively early on. This would require each client to still sync back that far to fetch any additions that could've been made to that squash since it was created. The solution, in my view, is to group messages associated with a certain squash together in a message thread. This is a WIP proposal for Matrix under issue https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1198. The requirements for threads to be used for squashing:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: