We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
If I understand well, the macro @reset is the equivalent of Setfield.@set!.
@reset
Setfield.@set!
Why did you chose to remove the !
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I did not like @set! because the ! usually means mutation. But instead the macro rebinds the variable, without any mutation.
@set!
!
Sorry, something went wrong.
Also, I had some vague plans to use @set! for actual mutation, but that never happened so far.
I am asking this because I use a lot @set! in BifurcationKit and I am thinking moving to Accessors
See also this thread #93 (comment) for set!/reset discussion.
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
If I understand well, the macro
@reset
is the equivalent ofSetfield.@set!
.Why did you chose to remove the !
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: