Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple FFT backends? #32

Open
Keno opened this issue Aug 21, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Multiple FFT backends? #32

Keno opened this issue Aug 21, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@Keno
Copy link
Contributor

Keno commented Aug 21, 2019

I'd like to revisit @stevengj's pure Julia FFT code (@YingboMa has an updated copy at https://github.com/YingboMa/DFT.jl) - primarily because I'd like to extend it for ffts over finite fields. However, it's a bit awkward at the moment to have multiple FFT packages that all extend the AbstractFFT APIs, since there's only one entry point for a given array type. How do we want to handle this situation? Does it make sense to pass some sort of backend token to all the APIs that the implementation can then dispatch on? Any other suggestions?

@mkborregaard
Copy link

Is it correctly understood that this issue means that no packages can depend on e.g. FFTW for internal (non-exported) functionality, because that would break the FFT workflow for any package user having a different FFT package loaded?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants