Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Not yet, no. There are still several KA.jl-related regressions we need to look into. Why do you require GPUArrays v11? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
With the syntax changes in GPUArrays, we already adjusted our usage of it a few weeks after v11 was released. To be honest, I just didn't think about it being incompatible with CUDA.jl. Can you give a rough estimate when a compatible version would be released? Just to know if it's worth it to roll back the changes we made in our package. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The problem is really finding time to look into the regressions. I currently have some other obligations, and @vchuravy doesn't appear to have time either. I hope this to be resolved in a couple of weeks (early in the new year, realistically), but if you need this merged feel free to help out with the optimization work: JuliaGPU/GPUArrays.jl#565 (there's several PRs on KA.jl too) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Tim, would it be possible to release v5.5.3 to have a tagged version that has compatibility with GPUArrays v11?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions