Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inquiry about Conformance Class 8: 'INSPIRE data sets and data set series linked service metadata' #1086

Closed
AljosaCekic opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@AljosaCekic
Copy link

Hello,

here is Aljosa Cekic from the State Office for Geoinformation and Land Development Baden-Württemberg (LGL), the Competence Center for Geodata Infrastructure.

I would have a question regarding the calculation of INSPIRE-Indicators. Could you answer me whether the check of Conformance Class 8: 'INSPIRE data sets and data set series linked service metadata' for the metadata of data sets and data set series is obligatory for the INSPIRE-Indicators calculation?

I am looking forward for your answer.

Kind regards,
Aljosa Cekic

@MarcoMinghini
Copy link
Contributor

Dear @AljosaCekic,
for the calculation of the INSPIRE Monitoring indicator on the conformity of dataset metadata (indicator MDi1.1), Conformace Class 8 is not used. This is because Conformance Class 8 implements the good practice on data-service linking simplification, which - although being a recommended and more efficient approach than the traditional one - is only an alternative way to encode dataset metadata.
Best regards.

@INSPIRE-MIF INSPIRE-MIF locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2024
@fabiovinci fabiovinci converted this issue into discussion #1087 Jun 5, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants