Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

INSPIRE validator doesn`t recognize ATOM Digital certificate- SPAIN #1008

Closed
abadppa0 opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 9 comments
Closed

INSPIRE validator doesn`t recognize ATOM Digital certificate- SPAIN #1008

abadppa0 opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 9 comments
Labels
deployed in reference validator Solution deployed in production non-breaking change The change makes tests less restrictive and it has no impact on resources already tested
Milestone

Comments

@abadppa0
Copy link

abadppa0 commented Nov 13, 2023

Hello,
The INSPIRE validator does not recognise the ATOM of FEGA. We have tested installing the ATOM in another organisation and the validator does recognise it without problems, but when the ATOM URL depends on FEGA, the validator says "ERROR An error has occured".

Here are the steps:

  1. The INSPIRE validator does not recognise the ATOM service.
  2. If the ATOM XML is copied to a server of another organisation, which has another certificate, the validator is recognised it and the validator's output is Ok,
  3. Therefore, we think that there may be a problem with the certificate of the original server, since the difference in the publication of the XML in one organisation and another is the certificate.

I enclose the FEGA´s certificate certificado_FEGA

and this is the error message
Error certificate.txt

Thank you very much for your help.
Paloma Abad

@fabiovinci
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @abadppa0,

thank you for reporting the issue, we will have a look asap.

@DanielMartinPerezdeLeon
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @abadppa0,

Thank you for notifying us about this problem. After incorporating the provided certificate, the reported issue appears to be resolved. To ensure seamless functionality, we are updating the staging deploy of the INSPIRE VALIDATOR with this certificate. You can verify the URL's functionality in the staging environment by visiting http://staging-inspire-validator.eu-west-1.elasticbeanstalk.com/etf-webapp/home/index.html.

Furthermore, rest assured that this certificate will be included in the upcoming official release of the VALIDATOR. Should you encounter any additional issues or have further feedback, please don't hesitate to reach out to us.

Regards,

@fabiovinci fabiovinci added ready for testing Solution provided to reporter or developed & deployed in staging (or beta), waiting for testing and removed under development labels Nov 15, 2023
@pablobarreira
Copy link

Dear all.

I am in charge of the data that abadppa0 is refering to. Is it possible that the certificate is not already included in the staging deploy?

We have tried and got this error right now:
error.txt

Thank you!

@fabiovinci fabiovinci added under analysis and removed ready for testing Solution provided to reporter or developed & deployed in staging (or beta), waiting for testing labels Nov 16, 2023
@pablobarreira
Copy link

Hi again.

A few days ago (21st of november) the staging environment was working good with the certificate that we have the problems.

Now seems to be failing again with the same certificate, getting the same error as we report at first.

Could you please try to have a look to it? Thank you in advance

@jenriquesoriano
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @pablobarreira ,

it seems that the info for the tests cannot be accessed using the provided url (https://www.fega.gob.es/atom/es.fega.sigpac.xml).
Since we have verified that the certificate has been loaded in the Staging instance and you verified this some days ago (November 21st), could you confirm the details of the URL you are testing?

Thanks a lot.

Best regards,

@pablobarreira
Copy link

Hi!

We are not using that URL because previously it asks to accept terms and conditions. We internally remove that requirement and we are using: https://www.fega.gob.es/atom3/es.fega.sigpac.xml

Thanks in advance

@jenriquesoriano jenriquesoriano added ready for testing Solution provided to reporter or developed & deployed in staging (or beta), waiting for testing and removed under analysis labels Nov 27, 2023
@jenriquesoriano jenriquesoriano added this to the v2024.0 milestone Nov 27, 2023
@jenriquesoriano
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @pablobarreira ,

thanks for your feedback and the provided url for the atom service.
We have tested it in the Staging environment and it is working correctly.
Please see the resulting test report.

Please let us know if the issue persists from your side.

Best regards,

@pablobarreira
Copy link

Now it seems to be working.

Could you please tell us a prevision of when is it going to be working on the https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/validator/test-selection/index.html ; cause we dont know when it is the next release.

Thank you again for your help!

@fabiovinci
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @pablobarreira,

the next release is scheduled for January 15, 2024 (v2024.0).

@fabiovinci fabiovinci added solved Solution developed and accepted, not yet deployed non-breaking change The change makes tests less restrictive and it has no impact on resources already tested and removed ready for testing Solution provided to reporter or developed & deployed in staging (or beta), waiting for testing labels Nov 27, 2023
@fabiovinci fabiovinci added deployed in reference validator Solution deployed in production and removed solved Solution developed and accepted, not yet deployed labels Feb 28, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Production: latest release in Validator issues Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deployed in reference validator Solution deployed in production non-breaking change The change makes tests less restrictive and it has no impact on resources already tested
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants