You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In EMu, we have a field titled "Mark Description" (backend name = CrePrimaryInscriptions). It seems to be used to capture notes about marks, inscriptions, and signatures on works.
There are individual AAT terms for each of those three items, but it would be difficult to determine in which way the field is being used at a given time. How should we type this Linguistic Object?
Thoughts: there may be some consistency in terminology used in the field that could be used as a flag while generating the JSON-LD. For example, the field sometimes started with "Signed: " - could this indicate the that contents are ALWAYS of type signature?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In EMu, we have a field titled "Mark Description" (backend name = CrePrimaryInscriptions). It seems to be used to capture notes about marks, inscriptions, and signatures on works.
There are individual AAT terms for each of those three items, but it would be difficult to determine in which way the field is being used at a given time. How should we type this Linguistic Object?
Thoughts: there may be some consistency in terminology used in the field that could be used as a flag while generating the JSON-LD. For example, the field sometimes started with "Signed: " - could this indicate the that contents are ALWAYS of type signature?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: