You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think there are possible several settings can be used:
1. If you would like to compare with the ground truth set and other methods, say, a collection of N images. You can translate N target images from N source images. Then you can randomly sample M pairs out of this N images to calculate the diversity.
2. Other way to compare among different methods is, given N source images, for each image, you translate M of them and calculate a diversity score among these M target images. You then average the score of all N images.
We use the first setting in our experiments. Since there's no standard setting in this kind of experiment yet, I believe any setting that makes same should be okay.
I dont understand the way1 “randomly sample M pairs out of this N images to calculate the diversity”,in table2 "real images .448 ± .012", for each pair, is there a ground truth image A and a ground truth image B ? in table2 " DRIT .424 ± .010", for each pair, is there a translate image A ( use method DRIT and translate from ground truth image A )and a translate image B ( use method DRIT and translate from ground truth image B ? @HsinYingLee
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think there are possible several settings can be used:
1. If you would like to compare with the ground truth set and other methods, say, a collection of N images. You can translate N target images from N source images. Then you can randomly sample M pairs out of this N images to calculate the diversity.
2. Other way to compare among different methods is, given N source images, for each image, you translate M of them and calculate a diversity score among these M target images. You then average the score of all N images.
We use the first setting in our experiments. Since there's no standard setting in this kind of experiment yet, I believe any setting that makes same should be okay.
I dont understand the way1 “randomly sample M pairs out of this N images to calculate the diversity”,in table2 "real images .448 ± .012", for each pair, is there a ground truth image A and a ground truth image B ? in table2 " DRIT .424 ± .010", for each pair, is there a translate image A ( use method DRIT and translate from ground truth image A )and a translate image B ( use method DRIT and translate from ground truth image B ? @HsinYingLee
#24
HsinYingLee:
I dont understand the way1 “randomly sample M pairs out of this N images to calculate the diversity”,in table2 "real images .448 ± .012", for each pair, is there a ground truth image A and a ground truth image B ? in table2 " DRIT .424 ± .010", for each pair, is there a translate image A ( use method DRIT and translate from ground truth image A )and a translate image B ( use method DRIT and translate from ground truth image B ?
@HsinYingLee
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: