-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Custom meta-images for social sharing of chapters #2410
Comments
I worry about the effort we’d burden ourselves with for the translations (not to mention the original English too!) as we have translated chapter names and logos for some of the languages. |
Seems a little pointless without the chapter name. Also could be a bit of a squeeze for those chapters with multiple authors. I think if we wanted to go this route then we need to auto-generate them on the fly to reduce effort but still allow internationalisation. Just need to try our best to avoid overflow issues with text. |
The chapter name will still be visible and localized in the heading of the social card. Including author info in the card has a few points:
|
The main burden is in moving this to a dynamic, server-generated, image rather than a static image as it is now. The social media widgets do require an image here rather than HTML/CSS/Images. But to be honest I think we need to do that anyway if we want to do this, as don't think it's feasible and scalable to create images each year (and definitely not with different languages). |
Sharing a chapter on social media will create a rich media card based on the hero image for the chapter. Here's how it'd look on Twitter:
I wonder if we could increase engagement by manually creating images specifically for social media that include more details about the chapter. I'm not a great designer so I use Google Slides to organize my mockups but here's a deck that so far has a custom meta-image for the CSS chapter:
Is this something worth exploring for all 25 chapters? If so does anyone have ideas to make these cards look nicer?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: