-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 632
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean Build for 2019 #2347
Clean Build for 2019 #2347
Conversation
Hmmm.... interesting. I'm seeing errors running the AllReady.ScenarioTest locally. I'm going to spend some time investigating. |
Appveyor appears to have had some sporadic issues restoring npm packages. This caused some non-reproducible failures. They seemed to have been resolved by the end of today. Examination of the output from Appveyor indicated that is was using Gulp 4.0. So I updated gulpfile.js to be compatible. This worked locally. As for the integration test, the local chromedriver version was 2.33 while appveyor was using 2.45. So local results didn't match up. I think I have a stable fix for that after a couple of hours of trial and error. |
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ | |||
"gulp-cssmin": "0.1.7", | |||
"gulp-sourcemaps": "1.6.0", | |||
"gulp-typescript": "3.1.5", | |||
"natives": "1.1.6", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I read some of the notes and warnings about this package behaving differently on different versions of NodeJS.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I ran across the same but I think the best long term solution is simply move to Gulp 4.0. I’ve got a separate PR for that in the pipeline. Decided it was better to piecemeal out things.
There are a lot of packages. Not sure if they are all being used either. NPM audit shows a bunch of stuff well above my pay grade :)
4669a8d
to
05c256e
Compare
I'm closing this PR. Why?
|
I attempted to rebuild the web only portion of the allReady on a fresh development system and encountered multiple build issues. This PR should resolve #2343(#2344, #2345, #2346)