You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It currently assumes single rounding implementation which produces some differences with my double rounding implementation.
At least prm/core/arithmetic/intopt/mad/mad_ftz_f32_00028 in the Base suite produces different results in [3544] and [3940] which I think is due to this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Due to accidentally leaving out the runtime query for asking whether mad is implemented with a single or double roundings (https://app.devzing.com/hsafoundation/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=540) as specified in PRM (http://www.hsafoundation.com/html/HSA_Library.htm#PRM/Topics/05_Arithmetic/floating_point_optimization.htm) from the specs version 1.0, I think the conformance test should not include tests which produce different results based on the implementation.
It currently assumes single rounding implementation which produces some differences with my double rounding implementation.
At least prm/core/arithmetic/intopt/mad/mad_ftz_f32_00028 in the Base suite produces different results in [3544] and [3940] which I think is due to this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: