You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a sequel to #2576 , which did introduce in a "nice improvement", by supporting task <filter> export [<reportname>].
However, the syntax feels, to me at least, a bit "un-intuitive".
task <filter> [<reportname>] export would probably feel more intuitive to many unix users, i.e sort-of "piping" the output of task <filter> [<reportname>] to export.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue does not complain about this, but I can see how that would lead to some amount of confusing behaviour. Perhaps what should be done is the following - if the description filter is a single word, matching a report name (like blocked), we should emit a warning footnote to remind users that syntax to refer to report filters is different.
$ task blocked export
[
]
The specified description one-word filter "blocked" is also a name of a report. Did you mean "task export blocked"?
That said, not a big fan of informational messages with task export, which is often used programmatically, at the very least this needs to be emitted on stderr.
This is a sequel to #2576 , which did introduce in a "nice improvement", by supporting
task <filter> export [<reportname>]
.However, the syntax feels, to me at least, a bit "un-intuitive".
task <filter> [<reportname>] export
would probably feel more intuitive to many unix users, i.e sort-of "piping" the output oftask <filter> [<reportname>]
toexport
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: