You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For users facing this issue, also applying Retro1_Inv_Cost_per_MWyr to Inv_Cost_per_MWyr would render expected costs in NetRevenue.csv. However, this will not work in the case of multiple sources for the retrofit with different values of Retro{n}_Inv_Cost_per_MWyr.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Retrofits is currently an experimental feature, and should not have been included on the main branch; in fact we will gate it behind a warning that says so during the next update.
Thank you for raising these issues. If you have ideas on how to fix this, you are welcome to submit a pull request.
We've merged the new retrofit module (#600) which should address this issue. I've gone ahead and closed it, but please don't hesitate to reopen it if needed.
If I understand correctly, generators with
RETRO==1
should see investment costs according toRetro1_Inv_Cost_per_MWyr
and notInv_Cost_per_MWyr
. This needs to be handled when writingNetRevenue.csv
output: https://github.com/GenXProject/GenX/blob/5ccb3cab4b60c20fd40e45150a7f54133bb7304a/src/write_outputs/write_net_revenue.jl#L18For users facing this issue, also applying
Retro1_Inv_Cost_per_MWyr
toInv_Cost_per_MWyr
would render expected costs inNetRevenue.csv
. However, this will not work in the case of multiple sources for the retrofit with different values ofRetro{n}_Inv_Cost_per_MWyr
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: