Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skeletal Animation #384

Open
yurembo opened this issue Jan 5, 2017 · 7 comments
Open

Skeletal Animation #384

yurembo opened this issue Jan 5, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@yurembo
Copy link
Contributor

yurembo commented Jan 5, 2017

Hello all!
I was played with a skeleton animation.
I created a new small project, included standart "goblins" animation which ships with T2D. Everything is good. This anim runs well.
But then I exported an animation from new version of Spine. Now Torque 2D is failed.
I think this happens because the export format was changed, am I wrong?

@yurembo
Copy link
Contributor Author

yurembo commented Jan 5, 2017

Exactly, old files and new files are different and they count is different

@capnlove
Copy link
Contributor

capnlove commented Jan 8, 2017

From what I remember, the atlas file added extra information at its beginning. Removing the first line used to do the trick.

Even if it works, remember that the T2D implementation is partial and based on extremely outdated versions of the Spine runtime; most modern Spine features won't be imported to T2D.

@yurembo
Copy link
Contributor Author

yurembo commented Jan 8, 2017

Spine runtime is open; I have seen Torque's loader and Spine runtime loader, there are a huge changes

@yurembo
Copy link
Contributor Author

yurembo commented Jan 8, 2017

Meanwhile in both old atlas file and new file the first line is empty and second is a name of a graphic file

@Mpskydog
Copy link

Mpskydog commented Dec 6, 2017

Has there been anyone working on finishing or maintaining any Spine runtime support for this? Nathan Sweet had done some work in it but nothing I can find after this Trello or this GitHub

They've since moved Spine work to a waffle, but no further mention of Torque. And I haven't seen anyone in this community that was actively working on it.

@greenfire27
Copy link
Contributor

Nobody has stepped forward to own Spine support. As I understand it is pretty out-of-date at this point. You are welcome to take up the challenge.

@yurembo
Copy link
Contributor Author

yurembo commented Dec 12, 2017

I saw docs on Spine site and looked making Spine support is less simple than T2D has.
Shoud I dig in :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants