Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Little Tiles don't render block without angelica. #91

Open
1 task done
Fabboz opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

Little Tiles don't render block without angelica. #91

Fabboz opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Fabboz
Copy link

Fabboz commented Nov 16, 2024

Your GTNH Discord Username

No response

Mod Version

gtnhlib-0.5.20 -- little tiles 1.3.1 -- creative core 1.4.0

Bug Report

with gtnhlib little tiles don't render hammered blocks.
removing gtnhlib or adding angelica fix the issue.
2024-11-16_20 15 14
2024-11-16_20 15 31

the first working version is gtnhlib 0.3.3

Java Version

Java 8

Mod List or GTNH Pack Version

gtnhlib-0.5.20
+unimixins-all-1.7.10-0.1.19
creativecore-1.4.0-GTNH
littletiles-1.3.1-GTNH

Final Checklist

  • I have searched the issues and haven't found a similar issue.
@Fabboz
Copy link
Author

Fabboz commented Nov 18, 2024

so i made this little change in LittleTileBlock

@Override
public boolean canBlockBeThreaded() {
    if (LittleTiles.isAngelicaLoaded) return false;
    if (LittleTiles.isGTNHlibLoaded) return false;
    return block.getRenderType() == 0 && !(block instanceof BlockGrass);
}

like in that fix:

GTNewHorizons/Angelica#528

@jkieberking
Copy link

I'm also seeing this error, I can reproduce it by downloading the littletiles repo locally and adding gtnhlib as a dependency:

dependencies {
    api('com.github.GTNewHorizons:CreativeCore:1.4.0-GTNH:dev')
    api("com.github.GTNewHorizons:GTNHLib:0.6.0:dev") // @TODO mavenlocal move this to CreativeCore
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants