Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Rename graph repo manager classes to graph repo client classes #1912

Merged

Conversation

MichaelsJP
Copy link
Member

This makes the intended use more visible and clear that this class doesn't "manage" anything but is used to manage.

Pull Request Checklist

  • 1. I have rebased the latest version of the main branch into my feature branch and all conflicts
    have been resolved.
  • 2. I have added information about the change/addition to functionality to the CHANGELOG.md file under the
    [Unreleased] heading.
  • 3. I have documented my code using JDocs tags.
  • 4. I have removed unnecessary commented out code, imports and System.out.println statements.
  • 5. I have written JUnit tests for any new methods/classes and ensured that they pass.
  • 6. I have created API tests for any new functionality exposed to the API.
  • 7. If changes/additions are made to the ors-config.json file, I have added these to the ors config documentation
    along with a short description of what it is for, and documented this in the Pull Request (below).
  • 8. I have built graphs with my code of the Heidelberg.osm.gz file and run the api-tests with all test passing
  • 9. I have referenced the Issue Number in the Pull Request (if the changes were from an issue).
  • 10. For new features or changes involving building of graphs, I have tested on a larger dataset
    (at least Germany), and the graphs build without problems (i.e. no out-of-memory errors).
  • 11. For new features or changes involving the graphbuilding process (i.e. changing encoders, updating the
    importer etc.), I have generated longer distance routes for the affected profiles with different options
    (avoid features, max weight etc.) and compared these with the routes of the same parameters and start/end
    points generated from the current live ORS.
    If there are differences then the reasoning for these MUST be documented in the pull request.
  • 12. I have written in the Pull Request information about the changes made including their intended usage
    and why the change was needed.
  • 13. For changes touching the API documentation, I have tested that the API playground renders correctly.

Fixes # .

Information about the changes

  • Key functionality added:
  • Reason for change:

Examples and reasons for differences between live ORS routes, and those generated from this pull request

Required changes to ors config (if applicable)

@MichaelsJP MichaelsJP requested a review from jhaeu November 26, 2024 15:53
This makes the intended use more visible and clear that this class doesn't "manage" anything but is used to manage.

co-authored: jhaeu <[email protected]>
The refactor also includes a change for the graph build file from `graph_info.yml` to `graph_build_info.yml`.

co-authored: jhaeu <[email protected]>
@MichaelsJP MichaelsJP force-pushed the refactor/rename-graph-manager-classes branch from 4098133 to 534de87 Compare November 26, 2024 16:27
@MichaelsJP MichaelsJP enabled auto-merge November 26, 2024 16:29
Copy link
Contributor

@jhaeu jhaeu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichaelsJP MichaelsJP merged commit 4acd9a1 into feat/graph-repo-client Nov 26, 2024
7 checks passed
@MichaelsJP MichaelsJP deleted the refactor/rename-graph-manager-classes branch November 26, 2024 16:32
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants