Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

There's no way for candidates to record that they previously held language level certifications but they've expired. This came up with a user who emailed Anne Marie's team about it. #24

Open
gobyrne opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gobyrne
Copy link
Member

gobyrne commented Jan 3, 2024

From @substrae: I see value in adding this as an optional field; we had originally included this in the design but it was omitted due to time and resourcing back when we originally built the profile. Applicants will rarely know this information offhand, so it's important that it remains optional so that they can save other information and come back to this portion later. Gonna let @gobyrne triage this upon his return, because there are higher value bugs / features in the pipeline I don't want to bump.

@gobyrne gobyrne converted this from a draft issue Jan 3, 2024
@gobyrne
Copy link
Member Author

gobyrne commented Jan 3, 2024

I think we should just add some copy so nobody gets hung up on it rather than adding 3 checkboxes or similar. We could check in with recruitment team to see just how important this information is though.

@gobyrne
Copy link
Member Author

gobyrne commented Jan 3, 2024

I think we can do it along-side the language selection revamp that josh @substrae has already designed.

@gobyrne
Copy link
Member Author

gobyrne commented Jan 3, 2024

See 8031 in dev backlog

@gobyrne
Copy link
Member Author

gobyrne commented Jan 5, 2024

Making this high priority so we have the option of including it in 8031 before it gets deved

@JoshBeveridge
Copy link
Member

@gobyrne I mentioned this in #8031, but I think a line of text suffices here. If we collect expiration information, we open a can of worms in terms of the admin bias Lee mentioned in terms of filtering for candidates who have valid creds first, when in fact it shouldn't matter.

@gobyrne
Copy link
Member Author

gobyrne commented Feb 7, 2024

Can I close this now? @substrae you've addressed in the language level UI?

@gobyrne gobyrne moved this to Design: Ongoing in Insight Tracker - GC Digital Talent Feb 26, 2024
@gobyrne gobyrne moved this from Design: Ongoing to Design: Done in Insight Tracker - GC Digital Talent Feb 26, 2024
@gobyrne gobyrne moved this from Design: Done to Done (In production) in Insight Tracker - GC Digital Talent Mar 20, 2024
@gobyrne gobyrne moved this from Done (In production) to Done (Ready to deploy) in Insight Tracker - GC Digital Talent Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants