Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong tables because old schema #264

Open
Leonardusius opened this issue Aug 7, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Wrong tables because old schema #264

Leonardusius opened this issue Aug 7, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Leonardusius
Copy link

Hi,

I encountered enough problems with mostly old mods which have incorrect tables shown with last RPFM updates because they use old schemas. Is there any possibilities to add RPFM an option to load a specific schema without changing manually that in app folder ?

@Frodo45127
Copy link
Owner

Nop. Schemas never drop support for older tables, so there's literally no reason to support multiple schema files for the same game. If a table opened with an old schema, but not with a newer one for the same game is either a bug, or the user using a schema for a different game (which happens a lot). So if you find that situation in any table and you're sure you have the correct game selected, please report it so the table can be decoded instead of using an old schema.

@Leonardusius
Copy link
Author

Oh, yes, it happens. Evem with PFM. When I introduce old schema it read values from mod table OK. With new schema it reads wrong. For example in unit_special_ abilities_table in one the value for passive column is seen as ticked and in the other not.

@Frodo45127
Copy link
Owner

What you describe is a swapped column bug in the schema which should be reported so it can be fixed. So please, if you find that situation, report the game/table/columns where it happens instead of using old schemas.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants