-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Secure Sockets Transport Implementation #74
Comments
Hi adpjhu, Thank you for your interest in FreeRTOS-Cellular-Interface. |
@awsblake Would you have any idea when this feature will be ready? |
Currently, we don't have enough resource to propose and implement this feature in the short time. |
Hey! At Stratio we're trying to use CellularInterface and offload TLS configuration to the modem (BG96). Now... A few things we've noticed:
Our proposal would be along the lines of:
WDYT? RFC |
Hi diogosilva0307,
New socket protocol type and socket opt can be added if it can help user to create their own secure socket API in the port. Please feedback your suggestion or raise a PR.
AT+QFUPL is similar with socket send command and it is possible to use common layer API _Cellular_AtcmdDataSend to implement the Cellular_UploadFile function. Thank you for your interest in cellular project. If you have problem implementing APIs, please feedback your question. We will discuss with you here. |
It would be useful to offer a secure Secure Sockets Transport Implementation. Quetel, UBlox and Sierra Wireless support TLS sockets, thereby allowing the use of certificates stored within the modem and reducing the MCU resources needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: