Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

integrate ComparisonAudit into server #250

Closed
kiniry opened this issue Aug 13, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

integrate ComparisonAudit into server #250

kiniry opened this issue Aug 13, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@kiniry
Copy link
Contributor

kiniry commented Aug 13, 2017

We need to actually run the RLA algorithm in two places:

  • within the DOS Dashboard each time a contest is selected for audit
  • within the Audit Board Dashboard each time a prefix of CVRs/ballot cards under audit have been audited
@nealmcb
Copy link
Contributor

nealmcb commented Aug 13, 2017

We should have an endpoint to run it on request for a given county. And/or just run it and return the data for every refresh of the appropriate type.

@dmzimmerman
Copy link
Member

What data needs to be returned that isn’t returned by the county dashboard now? And why does it need to be run in the DoS dashboard at all?

@nealmcb
Copy link
Contributor

nealmcb commented Aug 15, 2017

Here is the issue in which I crystallized the concept of a "dashboard" for the RLA, de novo back in 2017-03-15 for OpenRLA. The use we're making of the term has always seemed odd to me. I think of a dashboard as unified UI to the relevant current state. I think the SoS and the public (someday) should have an up-to-the-minute overview of all contests in the state, like this: FreeAndFair/OpenRLA#63

@dmzimmerman
Copy link
Member

To the extent that this needs to be done for phase 1, I believe it is done. We should file a new ticket for enhancements for later phases.

@dmzimmerman
Copy link
Member

#270

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants