We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Has anyone been able to reproduce the results in Table 1 of the paper? Could you please share the inference script?
We use B=50 for each class and var_d16 for evaluation.
all_labels = np.arange(1000) count = 0 for c in all_labels: class_labels = [c] * 50 B = len(class_labels) label_B: torch.LongTensor = torch.tensor(class_labels, device=device) with torch.inference_mode(): with torch.autocast('cuda', enabled=True, dtype=torch.float16, cache_enabled=True): # using bfloat16 can be faster recon_B3HW = var.autoregressive_infer_cfg(B=B, label_B=label_B, cfg=1.5, top_k=900, top_p=0.96, g_seed=0, more_smooth=False) recon_B3HW = recon_B3HW.mul(255).add(0.5).clamp(0, 255).permute(0, 2, 3, 1).to('cpu', torch.uint8).numpy() for i in range(recon_B3HW.shape[0]): PImage.fromarray(recon_B3HW[i]).save(os.path.join(f"./{FOLDER}/", str(c) + "_" + str(count) + ".png")) count = (count + 1) % NUM_PER_CLASS create_npz_from_sample_folder(f"./{FOLDER}")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could you share your evaluation script? I could only reproduce IS around 60~80 for different d.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Has anyone been able to reproduce the results in Table 1 of the paper? Could you please share the inference script?
We use B=50 for each class and var_d16 for evaluation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: