Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting a value for jitter has no effect #35

Open
lagi opened this issue May 19, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Setting a value for jitter has no effect #35

lagi opened this issue May 19, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@lagi
Copy link

lagi commented May 19, 2023

Hi.

I was testing the program with the following command:

./TeamFiltration --config TeamFiltrationConfig_Example.json --outpath testclient --spray --debug --jitter 10 --passwords passwords_for_testing.txt --shuffle-users --shuffle-passwords

Spraying otherwise works fine, but changing the jitter value has no effect on the functionality. TeamFiltration will just spray as the jitter was 0. I tried hardcoding the value to 60 with no effect, maybe there is an issue with the Thread.sleep in Spray.cs on line 180?

@Flangvik
Copy link
Owner

Hi @lag! The jitter (as of now) does not effect the sleep between each attempt, however it does effect sleep between each 20 accounts attempted. And since this is done async, console log wise it might look the same as without. I will correct this feature in an coming update so it does infact sleep between each login attempt!

@DannHacks
Copy link

I absolutely love your tool @Flangvik - I was previously jumping through hoops to use other tools with some of your core features like shuffle regions, usernames etc. It would be awesome though if the Jitter worked per user attempt, as sometimes the tenants are very small, sub 50 users and all the attempts close together seem to get gripped by the lockout even with a long sleep window.

Thanks again for creating such a great tool :)

@Flangvik
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the kind words of encouragement @DannHacks, i'll see what i can do about this

@DannHacks
Copy link

Hey @Flangvik, thanks for the fast reply, that would be great! If that value could be changed to randomise per login attempt, that would be even sweeter 😋

Again loving the tool dude! ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants