Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix 49974 attachment infinite loading #50511

Closed

Conversation

Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor

@Kalydosos Kalydosos commented Oct 9, 2024

Note : this PR is completed by PR #52195 to avoid force pushing the branch. This PR keeps the timeline and history for all discussions

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #49974
PROPOSAL: #49974 (comment)

Tests

  1. Launch the app.
  2. Open a chat
  3. Paste the text Alt text
  4. Send the message
  5. Click on the image
  6. Verify that an icon and the text "No Attachment Found" are displayed
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android_native.2.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_mweb.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari

ios_mweb_safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari
macos_web_safari.mp4
MacOS: Desktop

macos_desktop

@Kalydosos Kalydosos requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2024 16:14
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from chiragsalian October 9, 2024 16:14
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 9, 2024

@chiragsalian Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hoangzinh Hi, i'm pinging you about the translation process. We need to translate the wording "Attachment not found" in spanish (alone ?). Thx

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

@hoangzinh Hi, i'm pinging you about the translation process. We need to translate the wording "Attachment not found" in spanish (alone ?). Thx

Sure, asked for confirmation here https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1729070840273779

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

@Kalydosos I got translation confirmation. They said that we should use "Archivo adjunto no encontrado" instead of "Adjunto no encontrado"

@@ -1959,6 +1959,7 @@ const translations = {
afterLinkText: 'para verlo.',
formLabel: 'Ver PDF',
},
attachmentNotFound: 'Adjunto no encontrado'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
attachmentNotFound: 'Adjunto no encontrado'
attachmentNotFound: 'Archivo adjunto no encontrado'

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, got it. Thx a lot

@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Expensify/design will be needed for review

@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

recheck

@Kalydosos Kalydosos marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2024 10:57
@Kalydosos Kalydosos requested a review from a team as a code owner October 18, 2024 10:57
@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

hoangzinh commented Oct 18, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-11-05.at.06.42.10.android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-11-05.at.06.39.31.android.chrome.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-11-05.at.06.47.48.ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-11-05.at.06.49.36.ios.safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-11-05.at.06.35.53.web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-11-05.at.06.40.22.desktop.mov

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

For this screenshot here:
CleanShot 2024-10-18 at 16 13 25@2x

I think the icon above the headline text should use our icon color, right @Expensify/design? It looks a little light, so just want to double check. Thanks!

src={fallbackSource}
width={variables.iconSizeSuperLarge}
height={variables.iconSizeSuperLarge}
fill={theme.border}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider making this theme.icons instead

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, thx for the feedback

I tried theme.icon but it"s still light as you can see in the pic below
Capture d’écran de 2024-10-18 20-50-47

but a theme that seems to match better the "Attachment not found" text in both light and dark modes is theme.iconHovered as you can see in the pic below

Capture d’écran de 2024-10-18 20-57-58

What do you think ? also @dannymcclain

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The first pic (theme.icon) looks correct!
image

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Kalydosos Kalydosos Oct 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok @dannymcclain thx for the feedback 👍 , @shawnborton i will update the code if it's ok with you

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, Danny is correct!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shawnborton yes, i have updated the code already. thx for the feedback 👍

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

I think the icon above the headline text should use our icon color, right @Expensify/design?

Yes that's correct!

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

@Kalydosos can you add test steps for "Offline tests" and "QA tests"? Thank you

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

Bug 1: App shows "Attachment not found" error instead of an "Offline" message when view images in Offline mode.

Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.17.57.19.mov
Click here to view before changes
Screen.Recording.2024-10-21.at.17.58.14.mov

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ function ImageRenderer({tnode}: ImageRendererProps) {

const fileType = FileUtils.getFileType(attachmentSourceAttribute);
const fallbackIcon = fileType === CONST.ATTACHMENT_FILE_TYPE.FILE ? Expensicons.Document : Expensicons.GalleryNotFound;
const [hasLoadFailed, setHasLoadFailed] = useState(true);
const [, setHasLoadFailed] = useState(true);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If hasLoadFailed won't be used, we can completely remove setHasLoadFailed too.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hoangzinh no we cant, it's used in the code, here per example

onLoadFailure={() => setHasLoadFailed(true)}

We just dont access the variable hasLoadFailed but it used by useState

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just remove them @Kalydosos
Screenshot 2024-11-05 at 06 27 32

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hoangzinh ok i checked, it's done, thx 👍

// isLocalToUserDeviceFile means the file is located on the user device,
// not loaded on the server yet (the user is offline when loading this file in fact)
let isLocalToUserDeviceFile = FileUtils.isLocalFile(url);
if (isLocalToUserDeviceFile && typeof url === 'string' && url.startsWith('/chat-attachments')){
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if (isLocalToUserDeviceFile && typeof url === 'string' && url.startsWith('/chat-attachments')){
if (isLocalToUserDeviceFile && typeof url === 'string' && url.startsWith('/chat-attachments')) {

Screenshot 2024-11-05 at 06 30 22

Need a space here. You can run "npm run prettier" to auto fix those linter

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Kalydosos Kalydosos Nov 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done and commited, thx 👍

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack

Found a unrelated console error during testing with video, reported here https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1730765319227739

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

@Kalydosos we are nearly done here. Just in case you missed this comment #50511 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

@hoangzinh hoangzinh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. @Kalydosos congrats on your first PR

Copy link
Contributor

@MariaHCD MariaHCD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! We can get this merged once we have a final review from design

MariaHCD
MariaHCD previously approved these changes Nov 6, 2024
@MariaHCD
Copy link
Contributor

MariaHCD commented Nov 6, 2024

Ooops, @Kalydosos two issues:

  1. There is an unverified commit fff2058b246e1f45ae4a0f952a48a9a35175a4e2:

Screenshot 2024-11-06 at 4 40 34 PM

  1. There is an ESLint error:

Screenshot 2024-11-06 at 4 40 46 PM

@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MariaHCD issue 2 is fixed, i have commited the change. I'm working on fixing issue 1. Thx for the feedback, 👍

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure exactly where the latest screenshots/videos are—but I think the styles are all looking good to me. If these two videos are the latest, I think it's looking good. 👍

@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dannymcclain yes these videos are the lastest, thx for the feedback 👍

@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kalydosos commented Nov 6, 2024

@MariaHCD issue 2 is fixed, i have commited the change. I'm working on fixing issue 1. Thx for the feedback, 👍

@MariaHCD i will resign all the commits, which will sign the first one in question but the commits ids will change. I hope this will not break any of the automation of the process as i will have to force push the branch. Any thoughts on that ?

@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MariaHCD issue 2 is fixed, i have commited the change. I'm working on fixing issue 1. Thx for the feedback, 👍

@MariaHCD i will resign all the commits, which will sign the first one in question but the commits ids will change. I hope this will not break any of the automation of the process as i will have to force push the branch. Any thoughts on that ?

@hoangzinh any advice also ? I'm about the rebase and force push the branch

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

I'm unsure too. @MariaHCD can we just ignore that unsigned commit or we have to fix it

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

It seems PR can't be allowed to merge if there is an unverified commit. @MariaHCD what do you think if we:

  1. Rebase and force push this PR (Although it violates contributing guidelines but it keeps our discussions in this PR)
  2. Or close this PR and open another PR (mention to current PR if anyone wants to back read discussions)

@MariaHCD
Copy link
Contributor

MariaHCD commented Nov 7, 2024

It seems PR can't be allowed to merge if there is an unverified commit

Yes, we can't merge a PR that has an unverified commit.

Or close this PR and open another PR (mention to current PR if anyone wants to back read discussions)

This seems like the best option because force pushing might change the review history. Let's go with this option 👍🏼

@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MariaHCD @hoangzinh ok, i will set it up right away. thx for your advices 👍

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

@Kalydosos we can close this PR

@Kalydosos Kalydosos closed this Nov 8, 2024
@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Kalydosos we can close this PR

@hoangzinh it's done, thx 👍

@Kalydosos Kalydosos deleted the fix-49974-attachment-infinite-loading branch November 8, 2024 17:21
@Kalydosos
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM. @Kalydosos congrats on your first PR

thank you @hoangzinh for your help

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants