When using Parsed call number in the template, is it being pulled from the holdings record still?

[MaggieMcGee]

Hi,

If you use the parsed call number? Where is it pulling the call number from? Using the holding call number does not allow the call number parsing to work properly when using that in the template. I switched to parsed call number and it works as it should.

Thanks,
Maggie

[mgobat]

Using "parsed call number" in the template uses the call number from the item record.

[MaggieMcGee]

If there is no call number in the item record? Will it pull it from the holdings? Maggie

…

________________________________ From: mgobat ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 4:03 PM To: ExLibrisGroup/SpineOMatic ***@***.***> Cc: McGee, Margaret ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [ExLibrisGroup/SpineOMatic] When using Parsed call number in the template, is it being pulled from the holdings record still? (Issue #41) Using "parsed call number" in the template uses the call number from the item record. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#41 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATLNJSI3K5XA7DHBE2HFFK3VBTC75ANCNFSM5RITN4MQ>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[mgobat]

@MaggieMcGee, what fields are you including in your template?

If you want the "Item Call Number" from the item, then include "Parsed alternative call number" or item_data.alternative_call_number.

The holdings call number should be printed if you include "Parsed call number", "Raw call number", or holdings_data.call_number.

There is no logic in the application for using one call number if the other doesn't exist.