Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Game 34 Incorrect Calculations for Naval Refits #23

Open
Silver1974 opened this issue Dec 1, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Game 34 Incorrect Calculations for Naval Refits #23

Silver1974 opened this issue Dec 1, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@Silver1974
Copy link

Game 34--Britain, October 1803, two ships failed to refit due to not enough wood in warehouse, even though the order had been accepted by the game system. The one to watch will be the November 1803 order to repair Fleet '3rd Royal Navy' since that is done in India and we used essentially all the wood in the warehouse there to accomplish the task.

Looking over the Review Orders, the reason given is 'not enough wood in warehouse'--this appears to be the same problem as used to exist in the other Double Costs Game 27, until it was fixed: The calculation for the ship refit is incorrect, and so the system accepts the order, but then some ships do not get refit and so the fleet gets stranded at sea, not having enough MPs due to some ships not being refit

@Silver1974
Copy link
Author

The order for the repair of 3rd Royal Navy this November worked, so it seems the problem in October must have been something else perhaps.

ichatz added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2015
@ichatz
Copy link
Member

ichatz commented Dec 5, 2015

For the case of October 1803, the player issued individual "repair ship" orders. All the previous orders seem to be processed correctly.

On November 1803, there was a single "repair fleet" and two "repair ship" orders - all three worked properly.

We need extra data

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants