You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here is the article in the current version of constitution :
Article XVIII - Acceptance
A contract is deemed accepted when a member signs a transaction which incorporates a TAPOS proof of a block whose implied state incorporates an ABI of said contract and said transaction is incorporated into the blockchain.
In the constitution, Article XVIII is the first one which includes technical issues. However, it sounds somehow ambiguous for me. In my opinion, we could make the article clearer and more obvious as below :
Proposal 1.
A contract is deemed accepted when a member signs a transaction which incorporates a TAPOS proof of a referenced block and said transaction is incorporated into the blockchain.
Proposal 2.
A contract which incorporates a TAPOS proof of a referenced block and an ABI of said contract is deemed accepted when a member signs said contract which is incorporated into the blockchain.
Any comments would be helpful.
Thanks.
Leo from EOS NodeOne
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Here is the article in the current version of constitution :
Article XVIII - Acceptance
A contract is deemed accepted when a member signs a transaction which incorporates a TAPOS proof of a block whose implied state incorporates an ABI of said contract and said transaction is incorporated into the blockchain.
In the constitution, Article XVIII is the first one which includes technical issues. However, it sounds somehow ambiguous for me. In my opinion, we could make the article clearer and more obvious as below :
Proposal 1.
A contract is deemed accepted when a member signs a transaction which incorporates a TAPOS proof of a referenced block and said transaction is incorporated into the blockchain.
Proposal 2.
A contract which incorporates a TAPOS proof of a referenced block and an ABI of said contract is deemed accepted when a member signs said contract which is incorporated into the blockchain.
Any comments would be helpful.
Thanks.
Leo from EOS NodeOne
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: