Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problems with crusher models #162

Open
JacobSchmidt2000 opened this issue Sep 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Problems with crusher models #162

JacobSchmidt2000 opened this issue Sep 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@JacobSchmidt2000
Copy link

When testing some crusher functions and selection functions I have some problems with the Unit: Crusher PBTM. When choosing for Selection=Constant and Breakage =Binary the crushing process is displayed correctly by changing the PSD. However, if I change the selection, for example, Linear and the Breakage to Vogel, the PSD of the output flow and input flow does not change. I have tried to vary the parameters, but the problem remains. In some cases, the string "nan" is displayed instead of the values of the particle size distribution. The flowsheet is in the ZIP.file

Batch_modus.zip

@vasylskorych vasylskorych added bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Sep 20, 2023
@vasylskorych
Copy link
Member

I believe, it happent mostly because of the values of the selection function, which are often close to 0 with default parameters, therefore, almost no material is selected for breakage. E.g., for linear function, the selection function for each particle is equal to its volume, meaning S is somewhat in the area between 1e-15 and 1e07.

@vasylskorych vasylskorych removed the bug Something isn't working label Sep 20, 2023
@JacobSchmidt2000
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much for your answer.

I have tried again to vary the parameter selection. I first left the breaking function on binary for the test series and changed the functions for the selection matrix.

For selection = constant, the following values were used: [S_scale=1; S1=2; dt_min=0; dt_max=2]. With these values, the individual mass fractions changed.

For the selection Selection = Linear, the parameter S1 is omitted. S_scale was set to the maximum value of 1 and the values for the "maximum time step for integration" varied from 0.01 to 1e+9. However, the mass fractions could not be changed. The same problem exists for the selection = Quadratic.

Likewise, when selecting Selection = Power, no change in the mass fractions can be seen, even if high values for S1 were selected.

For Selection = Exponential, a breaking process takes place again. A change in the mass fractions could be achieved with the initial values [S_scale=1; S1=2; dt_min=0; dt_max=2].

For the selection of King and Austin, no breaking process takes place no matter what values I put in.

I don't think the problem lies in the low values for the selection parameters, but I don't know the reason why only 2 of 7 breaking processes take place in my case. Do you also experience these problems or am I doing something wrong?

@vasylskorych vasylskorych added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 4, 2023
@vasylskorych
Copy link
Member

I also have the same behavior, so I need to check the model substantially

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants