Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wish: MRU (most recently used) Nodes #141

Open
SSGreen opened this issue Dec 13, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

Wish: MRU (most recently used) Nodes #141

SSGreen opened this issue Dec 13, 2013 · 2 comments
Labels
Nodes Nodal improvement UX UX improvement

Comments

@SSGreen
Copy link

SSGreen commented Dec 13, 2013

It would be great to have a list of the most recently used nodes, maybe just five or so, so that you could grab one from there rather than having to type it in the search. As a newbie, I tend to use a lot of watch nodes. These would undoubtedly show up in the MRUs, and thus would speed up the time to throw together a graph. I also find myself often clustering several of the same nodes (number inputs, for example), but I may not set them up all at once. Here again, their presence in a MRU list would make it quicker.

@andydandy74
Copy link

+1
This could be available in the context menu when right-clicking in the canvas, just like the recent commands list in Revit.

@Racel
Copy link

Racel commented Oct 16, 2017

This is a good idea, and one that was brought up as a primary concern for customers in a recent focus group session. We will try to address this soon. Assigning to myself and adding to the UX Love label.

@Racel Racel self-assigned this Oct 16, 2017
@Amoursol Amoursol transferred this issue from DynamoDS/Dynamo Apr 1, 2020
@Amoursol Amoursol added Nodes Nodal improvement UX UX improvement labels Apr 1, 2020
@avidit avidit moved this to Backlog in Dynamo Wishlist Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Nodes Nodal improvement UX UX improvement
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants