You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Inside each protocol that contains the volume data there are two fields I am using. One is chains to get the list of available blockchains, the other is breakdown24h. I have noticed that some names in chains don't have a direct mapping (even using lower casing) to their counterparts in breakdown24h. The following image shows and example for the opBNB chain
I have also detect some additional inconsistencies that I am sharing in the following mapping
Context
I am using the folllowing endpoints to pull data for volume
Problem
Inside each protocol that contains the volume data there are two fields I am using. One is
chains
to get the list of available blockchains, the other isbreakdown24h
. I have noticed that some names inchains
don't have a direct mapping (even using lower casing) to their counterparts inbreakdown24h
. The following image shows and example for theopBNB
chainI have also detect some additional inconsistencies that I am sharing in the following mapping
Questions
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: