-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Mopping Mode selection #443
Comments
Additional details: |
As my bot does not have this option, I have some additional questions:
|
This feature request is included in issue #441 but with a third sweep mode called «fast» for some robots such as the T20 omni |
In the ecovacs-deebot.js this command implemented in the setWaterinfo command for the 950-type robots(they differentiate beween 950-types and non950-types)
In my logs i found corresponding messages:
But i can't "write" nor expand that script for python...hardly missing skills in java and python :/ imho just needed an extension of the water_info.py and the _mqtt_params of the class SetWaterInfo needs an "OR" to diffentiate the payload from amount and sweepType of that command Should be {"amount":3,"enable":1,"sweepType":1,"type":1} where the amount leads to the setwaterinfo command... Btw what that "falling back to legacy way" means and what the non legacy way could be, i have no clue but would be cool to know Question:
in the init.py under events a thing what needed? and in the water_info.py something like:
Makes this sense to start with? |
Is there an existing issue for this?
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Hi,
thanks for your wonderful work.
I've an Ecovacs X10 OMNI and I've seen that there's no option for "Mopping Mode" (Standard/Deep) in your integration.
I would like to add this option.
Suggested solution
I've sniffed the traffic between Ecovacs app and Ecovacs servers and I've found the command sent. See Api example request.
Api example request
Alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional information
Let me know if you need more informations to add this feature.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: