Replies: 1 comment
-
Tagging @Devatoria for visibility on this, also thinking if we should make this an issue rather than a discussion? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi DataDog Chaos Team!
I just wanted to reach out to see if you better understand how to troubleshoot the issue we are having. I currently don't have the time to fully deep dive into this issue but if there are any steps I can take let me know. We are running the controller on version 7.13.1
Our application pod
fault-injection-showcase
, consists of two containers, the application containerfault-injection-showcase
and anistio-proxy
containerWhen running a cpu-pressure experiment against my application, with this manifest
I find no evidence to suggest that the fault-injection-showcase container has increased cpu-pressure, only the istio-proxy container is showing 100% cpu pressure
The injector pod also reaches a Failed state after the duration. This only happens with the cpu-pressure experiments (not with state or network experiments)
However, if I specify the container in the manifest below
It correctly injects into the fault-injection-showcase container 100% cpu-pressure. Though the pod still fails.
I also ran one experiment where I specify both containers in the manifest istio-proxy and fault-injection-showcase
And I find that it targets all the necessary pods, but in one pod it injects the fault-injection-showcase containers (and not istio-proxy) and in the other pod it injects the istio-proxy (and not the fault-injection-showcase)
If you have any ideas on where to go about solving this, it would be greatly appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions