Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add links to the applications (solutions, simulators, services) #3

Open
erikvullings opened this issue Mar 23, 2018 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@erikvullings
Copy link
Contributor

It would be nice if, e.g. in the adapter's configuration message, it would contain a link to the actual service, so we could visit it from the admin's interface (open in new tab).

It would also require an update of the configuration message and adapter configuration (in order to share the link).

@hannahgoeritz
Copy link
Collaborator

Adapter configuration messages are currently not supported, as everything is pre-configured before the trial is started.

@JoaquinMB-Freq
Copy link

Why would we need the link?
Why will we need to open the tool from the testbed?
Also, what if there's no link (i.e. not web-based app)?

@erikvullings
Copy link
Contributor Author

For example, when we attach a COP tool, and I would like to go there and see for myself that it is up and running. Since many solutions will receive a dynamic IP address, it is not easy to find them, so adding a link (if it is available or makes sense) is practical.

In addition, by sharing the adapter's IP address, it allows us to infer which client is using certain services. For example, when a COP tool requests a WMS layer, all the WMS service provider receives is the IP address of the COP tool, not the actual name of the solution. So if the AAR wants to be able to say that the COP tool accessed the WMS service, it needs to infer the service from the IP address. And currently, it does not know the IP address(-es) of the adapters, so it cannot create the link.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants